Laden Sie Nachbarn und Freunde ein, SeeClickFix zu nutzen, damit diese Fälle in Ihrer Nachbarschaft und Stadt posten, kommentieren und dafür abstimmen.
Thank you for contacting the City of Raleigh. Your service request ID is #431426. We will be posting additional updates about your request as we have them.
This issue has been closed. If the problem persists, please re-open this issue and give us more detailed information on how to identify the location of the problem - then we will get right on it. Thanks a lot for reporting!
Thank you for contacting the City of Raleigh. Your service request ID is #434268. We will be posting additional updates about your request as we have them.
I just want to check, and somebody has, in fact, trimmed the tree back from the sidewalk.
I would assume that City of Raleigh did that, but for the very strange response that we got when y’all closed the issue. In any case, I’m closing up now.
This issue has been closed. If the problem persists, please re-open this issue and give us more detailed information on how to identify the location of the problem - then we will get right on it. Thanks a lot for reporting!
I now see that the "give us more detailed information" post is just a boilerplate "issue closed" post.
I'd suggest to CoR that they come up with something else, as this boilerplate doesn't fit nearly any situations and leaves a very confusing impression for SCF reporters.
8 Kommentierens
Anerkannt City of Raleigh 3 (Verifizierter Beamter)
Geschlossen City of Raleigh 3 (Verifizierter Beamter)
Reopened WillP (Registrierter Benutzer)
Anerkannt City of Raleigh 3 (Verifizierter Beamter)
WillP (Registrierter Benutzer)
I just want to check, and somebody has, in fact, trimmed the tree back from the sidewalk.
I would assume that City of Raleigh did that, but for the very strange response that we got when y’all closed the issue. In any case, I’m closing up now.
City of Raleigh 3 (Verifizierter Beamter)
Geschlossen City of Raleigh 3 (Verifizierter Beamter)
WillP (Registrierter Benutzer)
I now see that the "give us more detailed information" post is just a boilerplate "issue closed" post.
I'd suggest to CoR that they come up with something else, as this boilerplate doesn't fit nearly any situations and leaves a very confusing impression for SCF reporters.
That said, thanks for taking care of this issue!